Welcome to Lucid Dreaming, the online notebook of Santa Fe writer Gregory Pleshaw. Here we try our level best to celebrate all that is good with the world - and knock over ourselves trying to berate the bad. Life sucks most of the time, but when it doesn't, we'll try to clue you in. Because we love you!

Sunday, October 01, 2006

Off-Topic: Maybe...


Earlier today, someone correctly pegged my personality - they called me a narcissist for more or less "having an ephipany at other people's expense." (my words, completely.) but that seemed to be about the gist of the complaint.

well, um, duuuuh. Of course I'm a *narcissist* - I post my private thoughts and not-so-well-thought-out opinions on a fucking blog. which is just one of the reasons I deleted the posts in particular - but it's not the only reason I deleted the posts.

There seems to be a vastly distorted perception that people - lots of people, MANY people, in fact, read my blog *all the fucking time.* I myself have absolutely zero proof of this, and in fact, have more or less stopped promoting my stupid, useless, lame-ass, not-so-well-thought-out opinions to no more than a half-dozen friends who love me enough to take pity on my lameness.

Thus, for the record, either a) no one reads this blog, which is certainly what I expect, or b) lots and lots of people are reading this blog, which would certainly explain why everyone from Site Santa Fe to some museum in Arizona to certain offended factions that shall be nameless are so freaked the fuck out by the stupid shit I have to say.

If the latter is actually the case, let's look at why more than my chosen half-dozen might actually be reading this blog.

Out on the vast wasteland of the American intellectual landscape, I can think of about two people who have strong opinions and aren't afraid to voice them - sometimes poorly, but definitively *often* - and these men are Howard Stern and Eminem. Five years ago, I wouldn't have bothered to listen to either of them - they're both morons, more or less, but their appeal to me is that they HAVE opinions and they fucking state them. Real loud, too. Howard I fell in love with just recently, listening on the way back from Burning Man - Eminem I've had a secret affair with for years, listening to his blistering diatribes about everyone from his *mom* (who disses their mom in public? That shit takes guts) to his ex-wife and "White America" of which he is most certainly an indelible part.

In case you haven't noticed, these cats aren't fringe looneys (like me) - they are quite literally at the very top of the American entertainment pantheon. And I think the secret to their appeal, and mine, if there is any - is that despite the fact that I am boorish, angry, ludicrous, occasionally intoxicated, always with a axe to grind - is that I HAVE OPINIONS AND I STATE THEM - which is such a far cry from what the rest of America seems to want to do, which is to waffle and mealy-mouth their way through post-modernity's "moral relativism" like Bill Clinton asking a grand jury to define "sexual relations."

Now, watch this - this brings me back, in my brain, to my utterly visceral reaction *against* Klaus Ottman's Biennial at Site Santa Fe. I was poised to hate it from the interview in the Reporter which I read before seeing the show, wherein Mr. Ottman more or less thought he could successfully deflect all criticism by simply saying, "This show will probably fail."

Did Site's PR department cringe when they heard that absolutely puerile, "allow-me-to-lower-the-bar-of-success" statement? I really think they should have, frankly, because inherent in that statement was "I really didn't have a lot to say with this Biennial. In fact, Biennials are sorta ludicrous and contemporary art really doesn't have a fucking thing to say, so just gimme my fucking check and I'll hide behind my disclaimer."

I just think, "hey, if you don't have anything to say, keep your mouth shut." In fact, why have a Biennial if the famous curator thinks the show will fail? Why not do as I suggested and turn the space over to outsider artists and homeless people?

The level of arrogance didn't end there, however. Mr. Ottman actually *must have* vanity googled Site Santa Fe Biennial in order to find my critique (which wasn't a review, as Zane Fischer pointed out) and then he basically called me out on my own blog, which is certainly fair, but you know, if you don't want further responses from a blogging crank, why would you write a response in the first place? Furthermore, what the hell is a world-famous art curator like Klaus Ottman doing googling and responding to my readerless blog in the dead of night if he really *believed* in the heartless polemic that he used to defend his (in my humble opinion) lackluster Biennial?

Here's my deal - I write strong opinions. I am frequently wrong and I frequently get in trouble for the stuff I write. The inability to be willing to be wrong is what's *really* wrong with America - it's not George Bush in the White House or Bill Clinton screwing his intern - it's not even as complex as whether or not they lied to us (of course they did) it's that when the evidence was available long long long before we *knew* for *certain* that they lied, that Tom Daschle and Hillary Clinton had all that evidence and they did absolutely NOTHING, because they didn't want to go against the grain.

If people have nothing to say that puts them against the grain, they should keep their mouths shut. Living in a visual art town, I'm in the wild position of always saying what I want to say with *words*, so there's a lot less wiggle room for me once I've said something, and I get constantly crucified for it. (It's okay, I have a Christ-complex, so it's cool.) IF THE ART HAS NOTHING TO SAY, PLEASE, DON'T SHOW IT. DON'T MAKE EXCUSES FOR IT. DON'T HAVE A BIENNIAL JUST BECAUSE IT'S *TIME*. Shutter the gates and go home.

The last thing America needs any more of is a lot of pomp and circumstance over people, work, art, or ideas that have nothing that desperately needs to be communicated. There is really ENOUGH wishy-washy shit and bad lies floating around right now. If the art is "doomed to fail", then why bother to ask people to care about it?

Or worse - why get yer feathers in an uproar when a blogger with a readership of six actually bothers to tell you that your emperor has no clothes? I'm only stating the obvious, after all - which is what America is *really* afraid of. What the hell happened to the backbone of the people in this country? Why is everyone so afraid of hurting someone's feelings? Why will people avoid hurting someone's feelings at the expense of simply saying nothing of value at all?

Fear me, America. I think you're all a bunch of wussies. ;-) But to borrow from Eminem:

"(guffaw...) I'm only playin' with you, America, you know I love you..." because I also know you lack the ability to identify irony even when it playfully bites you on the nose.

-gregoryp(tm)

Saturday, September 09, 2006

Gone to Croatoan
Contemporary Art & the Playa

To download the "Contemporary Art & the Playa"
MP3 podcast, right-click here.


this piece was written between 2:30am - 6am in the lobby of the Ashram Galactica Hotel, Restaurant & Spa at around 7 o'clock and Chance on Wednesday, then delivered at 3pm in the Erowid tent. The written transcript and the audio podcast may differ slightly. The {Gong} between sections siginifies the actual striking of a small gong that I brought with me to the Playa for this explicit purpose.

Introduction:

Greetings and thank you all for coming. I was sent an email at about 4am last Thursday morning asking if I'd like to be scheduled to talk at Erowid today, and of course, I agreed, seeing a whole week with which to prepare. But of course, I'd forgotten that between Thursday and Wednesday was preparation for Burning Man, plus a 24-hour thousand-mile drive and all the usual distractions that greet one when they arrive Playa-side. So last night I dropped a Modafinil to write on, then proceeded to quaff a small gift-shot of Absinthe, never assuming that the combo would drop me for about five and a half hours of much-needed sleep - gratefully, I woke up in the middle of the night to a 24-hour city, and finally found the time to outline the flash of ideas that came to me when I was initially asked - but of course, I could've benefited from a bit more time.

More time needed - that's always the case here. We're a time-based artworld here at Burning Man, because the time is always ticking down, down towards the end, the singularity, the final denouement of the Festival, the Burning of the Man. To paraphrase Mark Pesce's talk yesterday, we know our expiration date at Burning Man, which lends to all our works here a sense of immediacy that would make any Situationist proud.

{Gong!}

In 1587, a hardy band of New World settlers made their way to Roanoke, Virginia. With 171 men women and children, the colony seemed much too large to die out and disappear in the space of a year, but when supply ships returned to Roanoke in 1588, they simply found no one there. Plates were still set for meals - there were no signs of struggle, and yet all were gone. A single note was found which read, "Gone to Croatoan," and the word Croatoan was found carved into a tree.

Since that time, Croatoan has gone on to become a kind of origin metaphor within underground and alternative cultures throughout the Americas. This notion was solidified with the 1994 publication of Koehnline & Sakolsky's book "Gone to Croatan: Origins of North American Dropout." The book, which chronicles various alternative settlements and modes of living thoughout the U.S. prior to the 20th century, would probably be at home on the bookshelf on anyone in this room, certainly mine, alongside texts such as the Whole Earth Catalogue, The Illuminatus! Trilogy, Lipstick Traces, and of course, Hakim Bey's Temporary Autonomous Zone, which unlike the Croatan book's historical nature, is a projection of a future culture, a blueprint of sorts that perhaps the founders of Burning Man - and certainly today's participants - use in creating this community each year.

{Gong!}

In the summer of 2001, following the last major piece on a non-Native artist that I've ever written since, I was mysteriously awarded an intriguing grant: standing naked poolside at Murray Gilman's house in Santa Fe at a party where hundreds drank sangria and marvelled at the opulent art collection of the discoverer of the Quark, a young woman approached me and invited me to spend six weeks inside the Waterman Library of Contemporary Art in Soho, New York City.

I took the offer and flew to NYC, sleeping on the couch of this esteemed collection, housed in an unassuming sixth story loft in Soho, not far from the building that was filled with dirt for an Earthworks project in the 1970s and still remains so, in a way that was all I needed to know about the New York Art World to know I wanted no part of it, such arrogant waste in a city with absurd rents and uncountable homeless. The collection. however, was an overwhelming and mostly private treasure of over 3,000 volumes on and about the art of the 20th century, including such texts as Marcel DuChamp's handwritten diaries, reams of letters written by Salvador Dali to Gala, piles of situationist, surrealist and dada pamplets and screeds, as well as more pedestrian tomes like lovely signed first editions of Clarence Green's first book and Tom Wolfe's "Bau Haus to Our House," as well as stacks and stacks of New York art catalogues ranging from James Lee Byars to Christo and Laurie Anderson to Yoko Ono.

I slept on a Louis the 16th couch and just mostly stared at the books before me, the backs on them with their titles tempting me to read of times gone by: The Truth of Fluxus, The Lies of Dada, Tristan Tzara Speaks, wondering all the while, as people of our era often do, how on earth it was possible that it had seemed at one time that art had had something pressing and vital to offer to the time in which it was made, and why now it all just seemed like such total dross, an opening to attend, a friend to congratulate, a piece to buy for the sake of it in hopes that the artist might someday find a voice and then, in turn, have something interesting to say with it.

I spent a lot of my time in New York simply walking the steets, making a 'zine which is now lost to data crashes, and visiting one strange little gallery in the Chelsea after another, looking for something approaching a real art to sink my teeth into. The closest thing I got to truth was one fortuitous day spent inside the Dia Foundation at a Bruce Nauman retrospective, watching his kinetic dog sculpture and fence-digging videos with his grand-daughter Sophie and his son Erik, with whom I'd gone to hich school with. And I asked him, finally, point-blank and such:

"Have you ever figured out why your dad is such a famous artist for this stuff?"

And he just smiled and said, "It's just like Hollywood, you know - right place, right time," and I can't tell you how grateful I was that he didn't try to sham me with some absurd lie about how damn important and meaningful all this silly work is.

{Gong!}

I remember the day I knew for certain that I would soon walk away from this world forever. It was a delightfully crisp day in August, and I was walking the streets of the Chelsea district, but a stone's throw away from the Hudson River, this fabled neighborhood of galleries for the young and the hip, and I chanced into a street level space where red dots greeted me from titled placards, and the walls were covered with canvasses and photographs of grey, brown, and black murky images, each one containing the words "Self-Portrait" somewhere in their title. The artist's name was simply "K.M." but I snuck a peak at the bio and found a first name of Kelly and the pronoun She. And as my pupils flitted frantically from one piece to the next, searcher for richer content, a well-rounded biographical sketch of the artist in front of me began to emerge from the depths of my very backbrain. It read like this:

My name is Kelly. I'm from Westchester County. My father is an investment banker, my mother is involved in local politics and the historical preservation society. I went to private schools. When I was sixteen, my father caught me in bed with my girlfriend and called me a dirty whore, then bought me a tennis bracelet which I promptly threw away.

I have no culture. I have no culture. I have no culture.

I went to Vassar to major in women's studies, but all women's history was less interesting to me than my own self-expression, so I switched to studio. I went to Parson's and continue to paint now here, in New York, occasional jobs in graphic design but mostly living off my trust as I find myself and my voice as an artist.

I have no culture. I have no culture. I have no culture.

I have all the books I was supposed to read as an artistic radical, but I sold them on the sidewalk when I graduated. I'm not down with the male-dominated patriarchal consumer-capitalist culture, but my work is more important to me than all of that - at least to me. My friends and I speak in ironic cliches at the cocktail parties we attend in the Art World, cruising for important collectors and curators, and if you don't like my work it's because you don't understand it. If you want to *get it*, however, you'll have to master the specialized discursive dialectic found sandwiched between ads for high fashion in the pages of Art Forum - for every outsider like you who says my work sucks, there are a thousand super-serious arts writers who use a wall of words as the framework to slip in a little of their own poetic prose, serving not you but serving ME, and themselves, propping up the central regime in New York and Washington by telling you over and over again that if you don't *get* the art, then you are too stupid for art, and thus another avenue of expression and the propogation of ideas is closed to you.

I am a product of this culture - and my work and the machine which propagates it are what my art world has to offer - a tepid critique of dominant culture and vast fields of alienating work that is designed to mostly repel and confuse you. My art does not celebrate because I have nothing to celebrate. My work is not interesting because my culture is dead.

{Gong!}

It was then I knew that I could leave New York - and the New York Art World - behind completely, for it certainly had nothing to offer me. I could leave now and never look back, for by then I'd been fortunate enough to go to Burning Man, yanked into the melee by the scruff of the neck the previous year, by a friend from the future that I'd met in the past, who knew as I did that despite all the fine advances that the Western canon provided us with, like science and the principles of reason, there was something lurking in the warp and woof of the human experience that simply was not being addressed in the global mega-culture we had created.

"A ten-day rave," I scoffed. "Exactly what I fucking need."

"If only it were that simple," he said. "You simply won't believe me until you go."

And by then, I had seen it - seen an arts festival where no one handed me a business card, where no one listed off their arts-school pedigree, where no one gave One Shit if the work was "archival" because most of it would be burned at the end of the week. It was an arts world where attendees were also participants, where art on the walls could only be there if somebody bothered to build walls, a world where even if 90% of the art was utter shit, it exuded a deep desire to be understood, to be appreciated, to instruct and inform just as eagerly as That Other Art seemed bent to confound and confuse.

{Gong!}

Off-Playa, however, one still needs work to look at, and in late 2001, I began to catch a glimpse of the work I wanted to see - and see more of. I was at an opening in Santa Fe when I saw something that knocked my socks off, aesthetically and philosophically. It was a large-sized canvas with a black background, on top of which was painted a Hopi kachina figure. Silk-screened nearby on the same canvas was a giant blow-up half-tone of the Chanel No. 5 logo. The artist had several other pieces with similar juxtapositions - a Koshare trickster figure and the MTV logo, the Hopi butterly dancer and a Ferrari logo - in that work I had, for the first time in my life really, even growing in the southwest within 50 miles of 23 Pueblo cultures, an instant glimpse into another world - the hybrid reality of contemporary Native American people, many of whom live, work and bathe in US monoculture, while at the same time cling (praise the goddess!) to pre-Christian-conquest spiritual systems that make even the weirdest New Ager seem almost sane by comparison.

{Gong!}

In the Hopi worldview, the totality of the conscious and subconscious sensorium is represented by the Kachina pantheon, a League of Superheroes numbering at least 400 major icons. These would include "spiritual" beings such as Koshare (the trickster) and Eototo (the leader) as well as more pedestrian folk like Field Mouse, Butterfly Maiden, Squash, and Mother. Each year, between February and July, the Kachinas leave their fortress of solitude atop the San Francisco Peaks which form the border between the Hopi and Navajo reservations and fly into Hopi for a season of dancing. Incarnating themselves into the bodies of the human members of the Hopi Kachina Society, they re-enact various mythological rituals whose origin dates back to at least the time of Homer, an oral tradition as rich and developed as any Greek tragedy, only in this case it is a *living* tradition unbroken by conquest and diaspora.

To see the juxtaposition of a Kachina and a corporate logo struck me as no small affair, a signal of sorts that while my pagan roots are mostly a product of conjecture, wishful scholarship, and outright fantasy, here are a people, living in our midst, whose genetic memory and actual contemporary ritual practice dates back to the time before Northern Europe took over the world, before Xianity spread like a virus throughout the planet, before before before before before - and yet, they too were living like I am, in this modern world, not tromping through the jungle in loin cloths, but driving trucks and listening to 50 Cent and going to Dairy Queen and using interest-free checking to pay for it all. I had to know more - so I began to look deeper.

{Gong!}

Back on the Playa, an evolving aesthetic keeps developing. Burning Man is the Tabula Rasa, the place, sez I, where society goes to dream, and the overall collective, derived from the best and the brightest (or perhaps just the wildest and the craziest) of mostly California subcultures (punk, goths, ravers, hippies, all with aspirations towards a verifiable *meaning* in their lifestyle stances) are hurled together into the crucible that is the middle of the nowhere, hammered by wind and dust and heat and cold, rain and forgotten items, the need to reach out and borrow, trade, barter, and gift to all sorts of silly strangers from "other scenes" - an incredible cacophony of bridge-building and increased tolerance occurs here, (even for the dark demons of the hour, the DPW) in what I've come lately to describe as "the white man's pow-wow."

In the process, art is created, though bear in mind that the vast majority of artifacts created by this temporary culture could not really be classified as "art" outside this context! Remove the object from this place and it makes no sense, because most things here reference a conversation that only makes sense here, and many of the things we take pictures of and bring home are less considered "great" because of a singular flash of inspiration than as a refinement of what began as a rather dumb idea - el-wire on a golf-cart being a primary example - most just string it up and turn it on, and it works as radical free expression only because of the loose guidelines for artistry that we've set up her and have decided to live by - some, however, take the "el-wire wiring of golf cart" to new extremes, modifying the cart into the Starship Enterprise or a pink bunny festooned with neon - but off the Playa, it's still difficult to pull these moments from the gestalt that created it and at which it is at home.

{Gong!}

If I had to narrow down Burning Man's aesthetic to two greatest influences, it would be a short list comprised of just two people, one whom almost everyone knows, and one who almost no one has heard of, much less read. The one everyone knows is Moby, master electronic musician, whose main "instrument" (so to speak) is the sequencer, a device designed to allow people to create both music - and art and film and nearly everything else these days - in a step-by-step manner that has evolved a rapidly changing music whose evolution is really just a modification of the initial incarnation. In other words, it's an aesthetic that fits perfectly on the Playa, whose inhabitants seek both maximum efficiency and comfort without ruthlessness, improving one's camp and clothes and social stature while still being nice to other people, no easy feat by the end of the week, to be sure.

The other influence is Hakim Bey, who was probably read by every early citizen of Black Rock and is completely unknown by most of today's finest participants, simply because his meme is present in almost every act and artifact that exists here. In his seminal text, The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Bey advocated an approach to art which resonates throughout Burning Man culture, a kind of anarcho-situationist-immediatism, one that encourages both the temporary autonomous zone which Burning Man most certainly exemplifies beyond a doubt, even with the rule and regulations that have developed within it, as well as the notion that all work created, be it large or quite dinky, should be treated as but ephemera, a notion flickering in the wind before the Burning of the Man, meant to be enjoyed here and only here by those who bothered to show up.

Thus, the best art of the Playa, the show pieces which inspires both attendees and those who catch it later in story, photograph, and film, is just not permanent. In keeping with the major underlying philosophical tenets that I've plucked out of thin air and outlined here, works like these achieve greater complexity with each passing year - and yet are *still* burned to the ground because fire isn't just part of the performance of the work, it is the contract that ensures that what is made on the Playa stays on the Playa. And if you want to actually *experience* the art, you have to come here and participate. And that's just too complicated and outside the rules of art's commodification by the mainstream art world, and thus never the twain shall meet. But the question really is - should they?

{Gong!}

I am doing a phone interview with Walter Bigbee, a Commanche photographer who was raised as an urban Indian just outside the Beltway and who "dropped in" to New Mexico in his early thirties to learn all he could of his past. Bigbee is a walking treasure trove of native skills, makes his own mocassins, builds his own drums, breaks horses without hardware, and is considered an expert in "brain tanning," a skill-set which so puzzled me that I just had to ask him what it entailed.

"I tan hides with the brain of the animal it came from," he said, non-chalantly. "There's a rule of thumb to brain tanning, that any animal has at least brain enough to tan his own hide."

Bigbee and I shared a lot as we spoke, about our mutual hometown of Alexandria, Virginia, about his strange journey to acquire the skills of his people, about his search into his heritage. And once I'd gathered all I needed from him to write his profile, I began to say goodbye and he said,

"But wait. What about you? Why are you looking to learn from me and my people?" And before I could answer, he spoke again in a singsong voice, "Do you know your songs? Do you know your dances?"

These are standard questions in Indian Country, when people are trying to ascertain the authenticity of the "Indian" in front of them. The full sequence goes like this:

"Do you know your grandmother?"

(What is your clan?)

"Do you know your songs?"

(Do you engage in ritual?)

"Do you know your dances?"

(Are you a part of your community?)

For a brief moment, a song danced in my head, an ancient track from The Orb, sequed into "Rhythm is a Dancer," my dances danced with passion and fire and Ecstacy and speed across a thousand mesatops and right here on this Playa, stars burning bright overhead, wind whistling gently on cool desert nights, both at home and in Black Rock, ten thousand party people twirling glow-sticks in poi-people patterns, twirling twirling twirling, no dance known really, just the twist of the body forcing it up and awake 'til dawn to feel the triumphant moment of having found a thing lost to us, a long long time ago....

"My songs and my dances are at least 9000 miles from here," I said, making a guess at the drive-time between Santa Fe and County Roscommon, smack in the middle of Ireland. "But even if I were to return to know my true past, I would find nothing - my people fell to British rule in 800 A.D. - your songs and your dances may be the closest I ever get to a pre-Xian, pre-Conquest reality."

Bigbee paused. "Crazy," said he. "I never thought of it that way - but maybe that's why I'm so popular in Europe, with the Germans and the French. I'm more than exotic - I'm a blast from a past they can't even imagine."

Think of it, really - if you want to catch a glimpse of what it might have been like, to live in a world before monotheism, before capitalism, before private property, one might look no further than the Native Americans of the southwestern United States. Despite invasion, genocide and conquest since 1492, many tribes still maintain their songs, their dances, their kiva societies, with some, like the Hopi, enjoying a more or less unbroken chain of what can indeed be described as a pagan culture, never conquered by Christians were the Hopis, living on their mesas, articulating their world-view with each passing year through song and dance, passing on themselves and their cultural beliefs from one generation to the next until now, when a long-haired Kachina dancer can share a canvas with a Ferrari logo, illustrating the moment when all that we have to offer as we chafe beneath the yoke of hyper-modernity jockeys against their greatest philosophical achievement, it falls as flat on the canvas as the silkscreen that printed it, and yet it is that very flatness which pushes us back to the Playa every single August, looking to learn new dances, looking to learn new songs.

{Gong!}

I haven't yet been out to see Uchronia, the Message From the Future that everyone simply calls the Belgian Waffle. I may go tonight, but I've avoided looking so far because everyone claims that it is simply the best piece of Playa art that has ever existed, and I want to savor that moment, see it when I've got nothing at all on my mind. Like David Best's Temple project, it seems to be one of those rare pieces of Playa art that transcends the localized creative dialectic and might be something that "belongs" on the contemporary art landscape in the Default World. But of course, like all art at Burning Man, great and small, it too will be burned, and will never tour the Whitney or appear in the U.S. Pavillion of the Venice Biennale.

But the question remains: "Should it?" And should anyone within this world, this secret society, this underground, this Croatan, this tabula rasa where all icons of our collective unconscious are writ large across the desert floor, should these objects even attempt to transcend this crucible whihc nurtures it and seek so-called "greater glory" on the playing fields of a culture that we know in our hearts to be dead? I, for one, think not, for Burning Man is not an incubator for the culture-at-large but a cultural millieu on its own. It's a true alternative (if only for a week) a crucible in which new ideas are born and nurtured and burned, leaving only memory upon which to build the next year's city. What happens on the Playa stays on the Playa. For it is here that we know our songs, here that we know our dances, here that we cobble together an understanding of ourselves in both the petty subcultures and the greater cosmos towards a cultural heritage that cannot be found only in our past - we too are a hybrid culture, standing on the edges of those flat logos, staring deeply into the eyes of our own personal kachinas.


You made it! As promised, here is the link to the Burning Man 2006 heavy-metal video slideshow.

Saturday, August 26, 2006

More Bad News for the Service Industry

The offender is not at fault - the provider is to blame.
Does this really make any sense at all?

Posted as a MySpace bulletin last night, by "Travis" (of Albuquerque) under the header:

THIS IS BULLSHIT

I am writing this on behalf of myself, a fellow co-worker, and all those in the hospitality business. Tonight at work, a gentleman comes in and orders a beer and a burger. He hangs out for about an hour and pays his tab for one beer and a burger. SID (Special Investigations Division) comes in shortly after he leaves (walking home) and presents a breathalyzer test with results of 0.17 BAC from the gentleman that had one beer and a burger. (The law states that it is illegal to serve someone with a BAC of 0.14). They proceeded to give my co-worker a citation for serving someone who is intoxicated. This gentleman, who had one beer and a burger, is a valued customer, who regularly comes in for lunch and has one beer and a burger. This evening he came in as always, showing no signs of intoxication. He was calm and cool, well spoken, and genuine, just as always. My co-worker greeted him as usual, and served him one beer and a burger. Now she is staring down a fourth degree felony and a thousand dollar fine! THIS IS ABSOLUTELY PROPOSTEROUS!!

Is she a criminal? NO! What she is, is an artist. A good one at that. A kind good person who always looking out for the benefit of others. What she isnt , is psychic. How would she have any inclination that this gentleman had five beers before he came in? What if she had asked and he said he didnt have anything. She had no means of determining that he was in anyway (legally) intoxicated. The point of this story should be clear. The new laws put into effect recently are completely absurd. Can we not serve anybody? Do you we have to go through twenty question with every customer before we serve them. Do we have to cut every person off after three drinks? Or even one!?

I have been bartending for ten years now. I am a professional bartender. We are not all college kids getting our friends wasted. There are some of us that take pride in what we do because we love what we do. Helping people through low times and celebrating their high times. Turning a bad day into a good day. We are not there to be down anyones throat about how much theyve had to drink. Thats their own business. In fact the fourth amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America states that we have the right to privacy.

Now, I am a single father. I have my daughter half of each week. I also have about thirty-seven thousand dollars in credit card debt, a car payment, insurance, my daughters school payment, gas, rent, etc. Just the same as most everyone in this business. We work in the bar industry so we can make good money, spend time with our kids, pay our bills and build a good future. What if the money I make gets cut in half? I lose my credit, my daughter loses school, I lose my vehicle, end up on welfare, with no future. With the new laws, this what I am faced with. Losing my job because I dont serve anyone or risk getting a felony and a fine EVERY TIME I SERVE A BEER! I understand that the state wants to stop drunk driving, but destroying peoples livelihood is the worst way to go about it.

This is harassment and unconstitutional. Please forward this to everyone in the New Mexico area. This needs to be stopped.

Friday, August 25, 2006

My Favorite Market Moment


photo by Sam Haozous



At the Gary Farmer/Floyd Red Crow Westerman gig at the VFW Hall on Sunday night. I have this guy's name written down somewhere. I'll post it soon.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

An Open Letter to Klaus Ottman:
I'll Eat Humble Pie Near You in December

Dear Klaus Ottman:

I received your comment to my post about the Site Santa Fe Biennial, and I have to admit you are right. My post, which is one of the highest rated articles on google for the search phrase "Site Santa Fe Biennial," is not a review. It is a screed and a rant about local art politics, a petty rivalry between myself and Zane Fischer, and about what happens when people (like me) allow their perceptions of a space and the discourse that informs it to take complete precedence over the work that is or was actually shown inside of it.

My only reasonable defense for trashing your show while elevating IAIA's show is this: while most Santa Fe art critics like to talk shit about diversity and multiculturalism, few, if any, have bothered to take Native American contemporary art seriously. That's my beat, my pet project, something I am willing to apologize for endlessly when it comes to its shortcomings - in the same manner that Fischer, THE magazine, and the Santa Fe Reporter will go to great lengths to cover the Site Santa Fe Biennial - even if many admit in private that they simply "didn't get it."

While interviewing an artist yesterday for a bio for that artist's website, I pointed out to him that here was an opportunity to explain his work to the public - as an arts journalist, if I don't *get* the work and I'm intrigued enough to *try* to get the work, I simply call the artist and ask. Or the curator. Many people do not have such luxuries, but I do, and thus for someone like me to say I didn't *get* your show was fully disingenous of me, and thus, I apologize.

However - because my review was never really about you and your show, nor about the artists and their work, I will take you with me for a moment down the avenue of comparison in our city's art politics. While your show was amply covered by *everyone*, (including Pasa Tiempo, The Reporter and THE magazine) the equivalent kinds of shows for Native artists were only amply covered by The New Mexican. This is not your fault - but perhaps you can see what makes me such a reactionary shit about a) (mostly) white Site Santa Fe, b) hearing from pooh-bah art critic Zane Fischer that "Indian Market sucks" while seeing no real retraction or analysis of any of the *ART WORK* in Indian Market, c) seeing that The Reporter had no coverage of Indian Market _at all_ other than a nice piece on Native Cinema, and d) hearing from the publisher of A Prominent Arts Monthly that Indian Market had nothing to offer him.

Again, this has nothing to do with you, but I am only mentioning this because while *I* can clearly see a racially-based bias about arts coverage in this city, and I can admit that my own white-guilt suck-ass apologist writings are focused firmly on the interests of promoting Native American art, no one in these other camps are willing to see at all, (it seems to me) that their coverage of your show and a lack of coverage of these other shows is a bunch of racist bunk about what Contemporary Art is supposed to be. Just as I think it's fine for me to say that "Site sucks and it's boring," Fischer thinks it's okay to say "Indian Market Sucks and it's all SWAIA's fault," and so we're all a bunch of rednecks yahoos (essentially) protecting our own little separatist turf.

You just happened to walk into this, however, and since you took the time to write to me, and to invite me to a private tour of Site's Biennial in December, I really have no choice but to write back and graciously accept your invitation. I, personally, know that neither the curator of a show nor the venue in which it is shown should have any bearing whatsoever on how a serious critic approaches *the work* itself - I wonder if it's possible for my esteemed colleagues to recognize that as well.

warm regards & please call when you arrive
Gregory Pleshaw (aka gregoryp(tm))

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Does Indian Market Suck?

post scriptum: I wrote this post on Tuesday. On Wednesday morning, the Reporter came out and I read the Whole Damn Thing cover-to-cover. The only mention of Market at all was a piece on the Native Cinema Showcase, so the inspiration for the piece Was Not True. However...it's still a nice story.

So today, I was standing in the foyer at SWAIA talking to SWAIA PR Director Stacy Golar when the phone rang, and suddenly, I was plunged deep into the heart of the imaginary movie in which I find myself living most of the time. The movie is called "Art Town", and its the story of the continuing drama of a city "where all actions are fueled solely by the cash of wealthy white people, where the Creative Impulse and the Art World Aren't even in the same universe - and artist Bob Haozous is a brilliant feral animal who loves to spit in the face of those who love him."

The call was from Zane Fischer, arts columnist for the Santa Fe Reporter and my good friend, (most of the time, though perhaps not after today.)

"Hello Zane Fischer," I chirped into the phone, as I often do - I am little more than a trained bird in this ongoing movie, trained to speak my lines like a parrot, though I occasionally detract from my lines when I forget the prime directive of the tag-line above. (My opinions often keep me from the big juicy roles - the money is not in opinions, y'see.)

Staci sighed and slapped her hand against her forehead.

"I don't even want to know," she said.

I was puzzled and continued the convo about a party this evening for a magazine I don't write for anymore, then I rang off.

"What's up with you and Zane?" sez I.

"The Reporter is doing a cover story on Market tomorrow," she said. "We hear it's mean."

"Fuck that," sez I. "Call all your sponsors and tell 'em to pull their ads from that rag for a few weeks - those cowards follow the money just like everyone else in this town. Gerry Peters does it all the time - and how much negative press do you see about him?"

We had other more pressing things to talk about - like did they get me inside the SWAIA auction this year? (And they did, just so you know whose payroll I'm on in the access department.) But an hour or so later as I was pulling into the Baking Co., I called Zane and asked about the skinny.

"Yo no se," sez he. "I just write my column and send it in from home."

"Well," sez I. "Rumor down at SWAIA is that the Reporter doing a smear story on Indian Market tomorrow."

"Well, I hope they do," said Zane, perhaps the Most Important Art Critic in Santa Fe (after me, in my own narcissistic mind) "I think Indian Market sucks."

I shouldn't print that. We reporters rarely print each other's opinions - yet, I always seem to be the one with the vocal opinions, the no-compromise in-your-face dickhead don't-come-to-my-cocktail-party opinions, so since Zane had one inflammatory comment (for a change) I think I'm cool to print it now.

We proceeded to have a heated conversation (we have them all the time - Zane Fischer LIVES to bait me into writing more screed that gets me in trouble) about how Indian Market stifles creativity with its criteria for inclusion, its insistence on certain types of materials, and its "frozen-in-time" stance towards Native American arts & crafts. Clearly, Fischer hadn't bothered to read my story on contemporary native american artists that will be coming to Indian Market - but that's okay too, because we never read each other's shit either. We just pretend we do and argue from the hip about it, most of the time.

"Have you heard what people say about Indian Market? People who participate in it?"

Hee hee. Isn't that something? It's like - "I hate that chick, but I'm dating her 'cause her dad is rich." Kinda unseemly, don'tcha think, to participate in something but secretly hate it all at the same time? Man. And yet the question arises: Does Indian Market suck?

Here's my stupid narcissistic dumbass opinion on that point-of-view:

The idea that an organization stifles choice and creativity is an interesting one, because it essentially places the oppressed (the artist) in a position of more or less utter helplessness. Thus the detractors from the organization in question, (say, Indian Market, or perhaps, in my own case (for I've done it too) Site Santa Fe) look across the wide expanse of what is being displayed (say, at Site's beer-hall warehouse) or the Santa Fe Plaza) and sees not an endless supply of interesting and pretty objects but instead sees what is not there, either by dint of outright ommission, or worse, all that *might* have been created by all those unknown artists who *might* hgave created something INFINITELY COOLER were it not for the fact that the organization's criteria were so restrictive to the artist's "fragile little mind and delicate creative sensibilities."

The beauty of the latter argument is that since the imagined work is without question So Much More Fantastic than what has actually been produced, (since it exists, after all, ONLY in the detractor's head) there is no reasonable argument that can be made against the detractor - because his point is, again, Completely Unreasonable, on par with the logical capabilities of the nimrod in South Dakota who wants to outlaw abortion simply because an Einstein or JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF might lie somewhere in those vast fields of aborted seeds.

The issue at hand here is whether or not Santa Fe Indian Market (and perhaps the Heard Museum Show and possibly dozen of other "tokenistic" (my phrase, do you like it? I stole it, really) shows throughout the Native American Arts & Crafts world are totally fucked organizations because they have certain material criteria about what can and can't be produced by "official" Native American artists. (And hey, while we're beating on what can't be made, why not attack the DNA requirement as exclusionary and wrong too?)

Pushing aside the fact that criteria of *some kind* exists for every damn show and contest and production in the known world (except, of course, at Burning Man, which no one in the straight Art World has any respect for because it's not "archival" (they burn it) and there's Nothing to SELL when it's all over) let's look at some of the criteria that Indian Market has in place, both according to their own guidelines and complaints I've heard as I skip, merrily about town, parroting my lines to those who will listen:

(INSERT CRITERION CONTENT HERE)

For years, I've written all kinds of (mostly) worthless copy about music, technology, and the arts, and so some losers in those fields actually talk to little ol' me about their fledgling careers. And what they talk about most are complaints like these, "the bar that won't book us," "the company that thinks our idea is dumb" & the ever-popular "the curator who won't hang my paintings." And my response to such things is more or less always the same:

*** Book your own damn show. (ya wussy.) ***

*** Start your own damn company. (ya wussy.) ***

*** Hang your own fucking work and the work of your friends. (ya wussies.) ***

Be an imaginary David against the Goliath of your mind. DO IT YOURSELF. Really. You can. And you should. And unless you're a self-indulgent asshole like me, you'll do it *without* attacking the cash cows that make your independent work possible - you'll be graceful, instead, and pretend they're Not Even There.

The hypocrisy of those folks who'll tell you they hate Market (behind closed doors) and then still show up bright and early to participate in it -

Wait! Please. I have to tell you a story, you really have to hear it . I have a good friend named Gregory Lomayesva, an artist of Hopi descent, who was practically raised in a booth at Spanish Market, who swore up and down that he'd NEVER do Indian Market. And guess what? He didn't. He hasn't. And he's still famous and makes a good living as an artist. I ask you, man, WHAT DID HE DO WRONG?

- are just the kind of people who are too damn afraid to build their own Rolodexes. Indian Market, of course, has the biggest one in town, made up mostly of Those Wealthy White Patrons who Control the Native American Art Market (with a MAFIA, I was told today. Can you see it? Rex Arrowsmith and Sam Balleen and the ghost of Al Packard riding six-guns around the booths on the Plaza, ready to shoot any Injun who dared to show innovation in their work.)

So they HAVE TO DO IT. They MUST compromise and play the game of Indian Market. But what exactly (pray tell) keeps these folks from making all that cutting edge work they'd be making if they *didn't* have to fall pray to THE MARKET (you know, the market, the same one each and every one of us making any kind of stuff have to think about when we're pitching a story - don't you think I'd LOVE to make a living making this fucking blog every day? I SHOULD BE ALLOWED. And yet I'm not...sob....)

Sorry. WHAT KEEPS THEM FROM MAKING THAT CUTTING-EDGE WORK? And if they are, in fact, making other stuff, is it *really* so terrible that Indian Market is their cash cow that maybe gives them a little flexibility to make that super-duper stuff?

In either case - cutting-edge or traditional - the patrons will still be wealthy white people. Just like the rest of us. So...what's the problem again?

Monday, August 14, 2006

The Cheesy Fuckin' Obit
(Better Late than Never)

(Composed while listening to Neil Young's "Needle & the Damage Done" on endless repeat.)

So, tonight, by accident, (more or less) it was revealed to me that my old pal Alex Magosci died in April. I guess that shows you how out of the loop I can be.

How fucking hard is it NOT to try heroin? I'm 36 and I've pulled it off, and I've done pretty much *EVERYTHING* else. Alcohol. Pot. Cocaine. Acid. Mescaline. Mushroooms. Crystal Meth. (snorted and smoked, like the wreckless high shithead that I can be.) Crack. (Yes, I did crack, read my fucking book.) I've even huffed Endust with a bunch of rednecks in the middle of Black Rock City. Warning. Do Not Do This. It is Stupid and Destructive. But somehow, I managed to keep from sticking a needle in my arm.

Ah, Dr. Dis - you needed this. You needed a kick in your dumbass about what a stupid waste of time - and life - heroin would be. And since you're fucking dead, you fucking loser, maybe someone else will read this and manage to Not Try Heroin.

I met Alex Magosci, aka Dr. Dis. (the name of a light-hearted yet mean-spirited music column Alex wrote for the New Mexican) in 199...shit, I *think* it was 1992. I had dropped out of college and I was writing for Pasa Tiempo, and so was he. I had written maybe three pieces for them, met Alex, and got him to write a piece about a rave I was producing. The rest was history...

Alex knew a LOT about music - so much so, that when he asked me to write about his band, I begged off for months because I hated his stupid band, and I thought it was because I didn't get it and I didn't want to reveal my musical ignorance. The name offended me - it was called "Junk," though at the time, GenX-nihilist stupid fuck Alex said he'd never done Junk, he thought of it as a metaphor for our time, since everyone with talent was doing Junk. Motherfucker...

I did, eventually, write about Junk. I probably lied about how great they were because Alex was my friend. I still couldn't get over the name, such a prim little shit I was about heroin, but you know what? I'm STILL a prim little shit about heroin, and for good fucking reason:

No good comes from it. If someone would tell me a story about heroin and enlightenment, I probably would've done it years ago, but every fucking story about heroin has a BAD FUCKING ENDING, and I've read all of them. Alex - WHY DIDN'T YOU?

Here's a list, for those of you unclear: Junky. Naked Lunch. Trainspotting. The Basketball Diaries. Hey - how much more fucking proof do you people NEED?????

I used to date an ex-junkie. She was clean before I met her, but I broke up with her twelve times over the issue before I finally did my namaste/compassion rituals enough to say, "Okay. She's clean. I accept that. I can love her and believe." We eventually broke up for other reasons, (she had the *worst* taste in jewelry) but the point is this: Speed kills. Smack destroys. And I don't want anywhere near it.

Alex...fucker. You were so smart and talented and pure, in your own stupid way. And yet...

In the middle '90s, I was living (oh-so-briefly) in a funeral home (I kid you not) in Austin, Texas. Alex found me and begged for a report from South by Southwest for Reverb, his short-lived online 'zine. I turned in a brilliant (maybe it sucked, but he ran it) report about Dutch pop bands, a wack-job act called Rope, and staying up for three fucking days snorting cocaine off the naked back of some cheerleader from Waco who glommed onto me for my press pass - wild sex, loud music, too many drugs, and total craziness at SXSW - that piece is lost from my archives, and the only person who might've had a copy was Alex...another piece of self-indulgent screed lost to herion. Thanks Alex, thanks a lot.

The last time I saw Alex Magosci was in the basement of the old mental hospital in downtown Santa Fe (a sanitarium, when it was active) in the Community Guidance Center waiting room. I was waiting to see my therapist and get a med check - Alex was there too, in some sweater vest, clean for eight months or something, talking twelve-step in the biggest way, I was so happy for him, but I couldn't help thinking - if you never loaded the needle, you fuck, you wouldn't be so shit scared that you couldn't ever drink a beer again, you fucking fool.

So - Rest in Peace, Alex - and for everyone else - DON'T TRY HEROIN. There are so many other stupid things to do, I promise.